Beardmore Inflexible
by last date | by total length | by number


19.06.2021 07:43

Dassault Rafale

19.06.2021 04:30

Piper PA-36 Pawnee Brave

18.06.2021 21:56

18.06.2021 07:07

18.06.2021 03:22

Junkers Ju 390

16.06.2021 17:35

Douglas C-124 Globemaster II

15.06.2021 05:11

14.06.2021 16:18

Lockheed C-5 Galaxy

14.06.2021 04:09

Douglas AD (A-1) Skyraider

14.06.2021 01:54

13.06.2021 23:08

13.06.2021 01:16

PZL P.50 Jastrzab

12.06.2021 21:14

12.06.2021 18:17

Thruxton Jackaroo

12.06.2021 07:49

10.06.2021 09:17

Yokosuka E14Y Glenn

09.06.2021 22:43

Convair B-58 Hustler

09.06.2021 16:21

09.06.2021 00:54

07.06.2021 17:02

Ahrens AR-404

07.06.2021 14:11

07.06.2021 00:01

North American AJ Savage

06.06.2021 21:58

Junkers Ju 290

05.06.2021 18:25

05.06.2021 17:58

Convair B-36

05.06.2021 05:25

Bee Aviation Wee Bee

04.06.2021 23:27

04.06.2021 10:33

Curtiss Eagle

03.06.2021 06:36

02.06.2021 11:39

Gail White, e-mail, 23.04.2021 19:07

Hi Andrew.
Not sure whether I sent you an email about 10 years ago.
So, I think we are related, through my mother Anne O'Connor. My great uncle was Jo (Joseph )Brady who was involved with the Inflexible. I know he had a brother Owen, who moved to Australia. Would love to hear your news about the family.
Take care.

John P, e-mail, 26.10.2016 18:05

My father was also an engine fitter on this a/c. He said when it flew it sounded like a lot of tin cans! He made a small metal model of the Inflexible which resided in his mothers display cabinette, it's now in mine.

Dave Goodenough, e-mail, 06.06.2011 14:40

I am in the process of gathering info on this aircraft, to build a radio-controlled model of approx. 3.5 metres. Any photos, details, 3-views, etc. would be most gratefully welcomed. As mentioned in other comments - with a wing thicknesss such as is seen in various photos there would have been ample rigidity in the wing, even allowing for the materials technology that existed in the mid/late 1920's.. For handling and practical issues, my model will not have them. I have no doubt that it will fly like a motor-glider!

C Mac Kay, e-mail, 08.02.2011 21:16

This aircraft was built purely for research. It was built by Beardmore at Dalmuir under great secrecy. In the air it was described as a pilot's aeroplane. In the company records it's referred to as the BERO BE for Beardmore and RO for Rohrbach. The pilots were Noakes and De Haga Haig and both were ordered never to do aerobatics in public. It was so strong that you could see the fuselage wrinkle and the young airmen used to run along the wings and fuselage. When testing was completed the fuselage was broken for paint tests then it quietly disappeared by 1933. It had the biggest wheels in a pre war aircraft and it was about the size of a 737

andrew, e-mail, 15.01.2010 06:02

I'm searching for for information on the crew behind this plane as I believe my grandfather and his brother worked on it . My grandfather was Owen Joseph Brady

Barry, 27.11.2009 14:11

Like the Beardmore Inverness featured elsewhere on this site the Inflexible was designed by Adolf Rohrbach as the Rohrbach Ro VI.As rightly noted, the design was of suffecient integrity not to use bracing wires, however there is always someone who knows better! It is strange to think that the allied powers put all sorts of restrictions on the German goverment about what sort of aircraft they could build and yet the British goverment sponsored a German designed bomber!

Peter, e-mail, 21.08.2008 14:16

th, Not sure how to add pic to site but have scanned it and mailed it to you direct. In passing would note have a full album of odd aircraft of the late 20's and 30's.

th, e-mail, 28.07.2008 22:45

Could you scan that photo and put it online? it would be interesting to estimate how much drag those cable added. might be a reason why the performance was not outstanding.
thank you,th

Peter, e-mail, 26.04.2008 19:32

My father was an engine fitter on the Inflexible (fresh out of RAF apprentice school Halton) and had this to say about this aircraft:
“ Powered by 3 Rolls Royce Condor’s and with a wingspan of 158 ft it was the biggest aircraft of it’s day. However the “Boffins” and “Know-alls” of the time decided that it would never fly and if it did the wings would fold up. Therefore before being allowed to make the attempt it had to be fitted with support cables from the wing roots to nearly the wingtips. I have a photograph of the Inflexible where these can just be seen. They also decided that it would need more than the length of the existing airfield at Martlesham Heath to take off. With this in mind an extra 400 yards of heath was cleared for the initial flight. Most of the population of Ipswich and the surrounding villages turned out to watch the event. As it happened the extra 400 yards was not nearly needed and the Inflexible took off well before the end of the existing runway, no strain was evident on the cables and according to those on board, the flight was uneventful and the aircraft flew well. It was never allowed to fly without the cables, which completely ruined any chance of the Inflexible being termed a proper cantilever wing. The cables were as thick as those used to moor ships”.

All the World's Rotorcraft

Virtual Aircraft Museum