Vought V-143
by last date | by total length | by number


LATEST COMMENTS

16.04.2024 02:02

Junkers Ju 390

15.04.2024 01:39

Convair 240

10.04.2024 04:14

08.04.2024 21:25

Piper PA-42 Cheyenne III / Cheyenne IV / Cheyenne 400LS

08.04.2024 12:44

Curtiss Eagle

07.04.2024 16:55

Cessna Model 305A / O-1 Bird Dog

07.04.2024 06:39

06.04.2024 15:03

Pemberton-Billing (Supermarine) P.B.31E

06.04.2024 07:27

05.04.2024 05:36

Fokker 50

05.04.2024 05:35

CASA C-212 Aviocar

05.04.2024 05:34

Saab 340

05.04.2024 05:32

Aerospatiale / Alenia ATR-42

05.04.2024 05:32

Aerospatiale / Alenia ATR-72

05.04.2024 05:29

Dornier Do-228

05.04.2024 05:26

EMBRAER EMB-120 Brasilia

05.04.2024 05:24

De Havilland Canada DHC-8 / Bombardier Dash-8 Series 100 / 200 / Q200

05.04.2024 05:23

De Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter

05.04.2024 05:19

Xian MA60

05.04.2024 05:18

Harbin Y-12

05.04.2024 05:14

Fokker F.27 Friendship

05.04.2024 05:13

Antonov An-24

05.04.2024 05:12

Antonov An-26

05.04.2024 05:10

Let L-410 "Turbolet"

02.04.2024 04:57

Södertelge SW 15

01.04.2024 17:07

Mikoyan/Gurevich Ye-152(P)

01.04.2024 11:41

01.04.2024 10:32

01.04.2024 08:34

Cessna Model A

01.04.2024 04:25

Vought O3U / SU


Anonymous, 21.11.2022 16:25

"...it was later to be widely alleged that the Mitsubishi A6M Zero-Sen was based on the V-143..." Similar allegations were made concerning the Seversky 2PA (several of which were sold to Japan) and the Hughes H-1 racer. However, there was no truth to any of those allegations.


jcf, e-mail, 08.02.2021 06:14

Jiro Horikoshi didn't use the V-143 as a starting point for the A6M, the Northrop/Vought design has nothing to do with the Zero, even the landing gear claim is dubious.


John Kress, jwkress47@yahoo.com, 27.12.2020 16:21

Assuming that the Japanese designer used the Vought V-143 as a starting point he made excellent design changes to convert a plane no one wanted into a thoroughbred killing machine.


BHH, 15.04.2015 20:21

@ Blair. Yes, EXACTLY. Except the shape of the wing is very different. This one a straight leading edge, the Zero tapers both leading and trailing edges. Also the shape of the forward fuselage from the canopy to the engine is totally different. Also the shape of the vertical tail is dramatically different in taper than the zero. Also the aft fuselage below the tail is fatter on this than the zero. Also, as you said the razorback fuselage is totally different. Also the landing gear and wheel arrangement is reversed from the zero.

But other than all that, yeah... um... totally the same.


blair, e-mail, 07.12.2014 02:57

It does look exactly like a razorback Zero! I think the USAAF just did not want to admit they turned down a good design!


joe, 29.08.2009 05:39

no comment




All the World's Rotorcraft


Virtual Aircraft Museum