Polikarpov I-16
by last date | by total length | by number


LATEST COMMENTS

05.05.2021 21:55

Saab 90 Scandia

05.05.2021 20:15

04.05.2021 03:09

Douglas C-124 Globemaster II

04.05.2021 01:09

Junkers Ju 390

04.05.2021 00:40

03.05.2021 00:11

02.05.2021 04:01

Piper J-5 Cruiser

01.05.2021 01:57

Learavia LearFan 2100

30.04.2021 12:43

30.04.2021 01:59

Lockheed P-2 Neptune

29.04.2021 18:09

28.04.2021 23:37

27.04.2021 21:44

Nakajima Ki-4

27.04.2021 15:29

Auster Agricola

26.04.2021 04:52

23.04.2021 19:07

23.04.2021 07:22

22.04.2021 07:53

20.04.2021 23:05

20.04.2021 21:50

18.04.2021 15:53

Aviatik D III

15.04.2021 05:03

Harbin Y-12

14.04.2021 22:00

Curtiss Eagle

13.04.2021 04:51

Bell Model 68 X-14

12.04.2021 15:22

11.04.2021 21:57

10.04.2021 19:39

10.04.2021 04:50

Mikoyan/Gurevich I-225

09.04.2021 23:52

Piper PA-24 Comanche

08.04.2021 08:56

Curtiss P-40Q


DimaLoone, e-mail, 28.03.2021 16:10

Какими интернет-магазинами вы пользуетесь чаще всего?


Ron, e-mail, 29.09.2014 01:39

I read recently that a half-roll was required first in order to dive or the engine might die in the I-16. Like the early Yak or Spitfire, a negative g dive was to be avoided.


Cargill, e-mail, 14.12.2013 22:23

A comprehensive technical description and discussion of the flight characteristics and novel armament of this first modern fighter airplane, the I-16, can be found in the Tinker biography, "Five Down, No Glory" (Naval Institute Press, 2011).


a.casais, e-mail, 08.11.2010 14:30

this little plane was called by the republicans "el mosca"( the fly)


Aaron, e-mail, 14.08.2010 05:22

The Russian called it "mule" and "little donkey" and various other names. Rata is my favorite, but then I'm not Russian so it doesn't count. As far as all my research has taken me, no I-16 to see active service ever broke the 300mph barrier in level flight.
I'll list the charictarisics of (what I believe to be) the cream of the crop:
Type 29 : Most pilots prefered this to the Hurrican because of its dynamic maneuverability.
M-63 1,100hp. at 4210lbs. its maximum speed was 259mph/SL and 290mph/14,695ft. 3425fpm/SL and 16,400ft/5.8 service ceiling was listed at 32,000ft. officially. After that anything goes with the Russian industry and VVS.
This was a very dynamic fighter, small hard target and pretty much all they had when Germany invaded.
Arguably could be considered the best of the Spanish civil war. Dickenson thought so.


Heldmyer, e-mail, 02.08.2010 03:36

Also it was the world's first cantilever-winged monoplane fighter with retractable landing gear!


Roderick Johnson, e-mail, 14.06.2010 00:48

Named "Moska" (Fly) by the Russians, "Rata" (Rat) by the Spanish, and generally called a "Boeing" by Fascist pilots who may have thought it a variant on the P-26 and didn't think the Soviets capable of producing it. Franco operated captured ones. A serious weakness by 1940 was no radio.


Sturm, 31.05.2010 02:41

Everything I've read confirms what Jagtai said. The I-16 was pretty dominant until the 109s came.

I understand this was a fairly demanding plane to fly. (I'm guessing the short length contributed to directional stability issues).


Ken Roper, e-mail, 29.03.2010 00:46

Confederate Air Force museum at the Midland, Tx airport has arecently rebuilt and supposedly flyable (flew before delivery to CAF) I-16. Amusingly small! It seems there were six of these rebuilt/restored in Russia a few years ago. Worth a stop at the museum if you're passing by on I-20.


Jagtai, 11.03.2010 21:46

As far as I remember, the I-16 was superior UNTIL the appearance of the Bf 109.


Ilya, e-mail, 06.08.2009 17:03

The depicted above colour profile is of Polikarpov I-16 type 24 of the 69th Fighter Regiment (69-iy Istrebitel'nyi Polk), Odessa Military District, July 1941.


Ronald, e-mail, 06.08.2009 07:36

I like the variants with the 20-mm wing cannons.
It had a great roll rate at high speed.
It even had armor for the pilot.
I understand the I-16 Mosca stung the IJAAF and their hard pressed, slower Ki 27 Nates in the Nomonhan combat of 1939 with embarrassingly high losses. On the other hand, the sturdier Japanese Navy A5M2 Clauds seemed to carry the day by virtue of pilot skill, maintaining air superiority over the faster Russian I-16s.


Ronald, e-mail, 02.09.2008 08:46

Weight of fire / sec. salvo = up to 3.02kg.
Climb to 5km = 8.2 min.
360 turn = 16-18 sec.


Dr. Nikholas M. Stage--PHD., e-mail, 10.11.2007 05:38

This Soviet fighter plane, the I-16, could have WON
the Spanish Civil War (1936-1936) for the Pro-Communist
and Loyalist side of that civil war, if Joseph Stalin
would have understood that 350-to-400 more I-16s, that he had
in his Soviet arsenal, would have "beefed-up" the 140
I-16s already in Spain, being flown by mostly Soviet
"pilot-volunteers".

This little plane, the I-16, was a spunky little fighter,
but it could out-fight Franco's mercenary Italian Air Force pilots and their Fiat-made planes,, and the Soviet I-16s
were more than a match for the new prototype German Me-109
109's being flown by the legendary "volunteer Nazi Condor Legion.
Stalin's own paranoia, and his tight-wad mentality,
did more to totally use up those I-16's, than finally being
exterminated by the Nazi Condor Legion.

However, history did vindicate this plane, as hundreds
of I-16s
fought most of the air battles, for the first 150 days after
Hitler's invasion of the Soviet Union in June 22nd, 1941.

There were 29 Soviet air aces that flew against Hitler
in I-16 fighter planes, in the first 120 days of the
4-year war on the Eastern(Russian) Front.

Again, not bad at all.

A good little, but tough, fighter plane, the I-16!!




All the World's Rotorcraft


Virtual Aircraft Museum