Blackburn R.1 Blackburn
by last date | by total length | by number


LATEST COMMENTS

24.04.2024 21:53

24.04.2024 07:32

16.04.2024 02:02

Junkers Ju 390

15.04.2024 01:39

Convair 240

10.04.2024 04:14

08.04.2024 21:25

Piper PA-42 Cheyenne III / Cheyenne IV / Cheyenne 400LS

08.04.2024 12:44

Curtiss Eagle

07.04.2024 16:55

Cessna Model 305A / O-1 Bird Dog

07.04.2024 06:39

06.04.2024 15:03

Pemberton-Billing (Supermarine) P.B.31E

06.04.2024 07:27

05.04.2024 05:36

Fokker 50

05.04.2024 05:35

CASA C-212 Aviocar

05.04.2024 05:34

Saab 340

05.04.2024 05:32

Aerospatiale / Alenia ATR-42

05.04.2024 05:32

Aerospatiale / Alenia ATR-72

05.04.2024 05:29

Dornier Do-228

05.04.2024 05:26

EMBRAER EMB-120 Brasilia

05.04.2024 05:24

De Havilland Canada DHC-8 / Bombardier Dash-8 Series 100 / 200 / Q200

05.04.2024 05:23

De Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter

05.04.2024 05:19

Xian MA60

05.04.2024 05:18

Harbin Y-12

05.04.2024 05:14

Fokker F.27 Friendship

05.04.2024 05:13

Antonov An-24

05.04.2024 05:12

Antonov An-26

05.04.2024 05:10

Let L-410 "Turbolet"

02.04.2024 04:57

Södertelge SW 15

01.04.2024 17:07

Mikoyan/Gurevich Ye-152(P)

01.04.2024 11:41

01.04.2024 10:32


Sheila Coy, e-mail, 12.01.2023 13:56

Just wanted to say thank you for those very informative comments, it really helps to have a feel for the time frame and uses of these early aeroplanes. I came across it whist I was identify a drawing from my late fathers “aeroplane stuff “ . Dad was passionate about aeroplanes in general and Blackburn in particular. He was also a keen aero model maker. The drawing I have is dated 1.9.22.
Thanks again.
I am going to pass all of the stuff I have to the BAE archive at Brough, may i include a print of your comments when I take the stuff to them.

Many thanks again

Sheila Coy


Bernard Rumbold, e-mail, 11.02.2021 22:48

A handful in a cross wind landing I bet!!


LR, e-mail, 23.11.2020 07:07

Klaatu:
I don't think you should discount Blackburn's talent for ugliness. Compare the R.1 to the Fairey IIIF which replaced it, or even to the Fairey IIID which was its contemporary. If it was really necessary to provide a place for the radio operator to take a stroll, I'm sure a more corpulent Fairey III still wouldn't be that hard on the eyes.


Daniel Kaplan, e-mail, 03.12.2014 03:08

I've been an avid aviation enthusiast for decades and never seen this before. It must have been very impressive seeing that huge plane operate from a carrier deck.


Klaatu83, e-mail, 23.09.2012 18:02

The Blackburn Blackburn was certainly a strange-looking machine, but there were valid reasons why it looked the way it did. In judging aircraft such as this one must maintain a perspective as to the period in which they were developed and the mission that they were expected to fulfill.

During the 1920s the Navy's principal weapon was considered to be the big guns of the battleships, and aircraft carriers were regarded as no more than mere auxiliary support to them. With that in mind, this aircraft was designed specifically to serve as a carrier-based observation platform from which to spot for the guns of the battleships. That was the reason it looked the way it did.

The requirement for which this airplane was designed stipulated a place from which an observer could obtain a good view of the fall of shot, as well as a large enclosed cabin from which a radio-operator could transmit the information to the battle-fleet. The pilot's cockpit also needed to be placed as far forward as possible, and clear of the wings, in order to afford a good view for landing onto the carrier deck. In spite of it's ungainly appearance, the Blackburn Blackburn did everything it was designed to do, and was considered to be a successful airplane.


Sgt.KAR98, 11.02.2009 19:38

No,it´s the Nimrod.


NICO, e-mail, 27.08.2008 14:34

I was searching for the ugliest aicraft ever. This is the one!

Cheers, Nico


Matt Collins, 02.09.2007 05:36

BLEH!!!




All the World's Rotorcraft


Virtual Aircraft Museum