Convair YB-60
by last date | by total length | by number


LATEST COMMENTS

16.04.2024 02:02

Junkers Ju 390

15.04.2024 01:39

Convair 240

10.04.2024 04:14

08.04.2024 21:25

Piper PA-42 Cheyenne III / Cheyenne IV / Cheyenne 400LS

08.04.2024 12:44

Curtiss Eagle

07.04.2024 16:55

Cessna Model 305A / O-1 Bird Dog

07.04.2024 06:39

06.04.2024 15:03

Pemberton-Billing (Supermarine) P.B.31E

06.04.2024 07:27

05.04.2024 05:36

Fokker 50

05.04.2024 05:35

CASA C-212 Aviocar

05.04.2024 05:34

Saab 340

05.04.2024 05:32

Aerospatiale / Alenia ATR-72

05.04.2024 05:32

Aerospatiale / Alenia ATR-42

05.04.2024 05:29

Dornier Do-228

05.04.2024 05:26

EMBRAER EMB-120 Brasilia

05.04.2024 05:24

De Havilland Canada DHC-8 / Bombardier Dash-8 Series 100 / 200 / Q200

05.04.2024 05:23

De Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter

05.04.2024 05:19

Xian MA60

05.04.2024 05:18

Harbin Y-12

05.04.2024 05:14

Fokker F.27 Friendship

05.04.2024 05:13

Antonov An-24

05.04.2024 05:12

Antonov An-26

05.04.2024 05:10

Let L-410 "Turbolet"

02.04.2024 04:57

Södertelge SW 15

01.04.2024 17:07

Mikoyan/Gurevich Ye-152(P)

01.04.2024 11:41

01.04.2024 10:32

01.04.2024 08:34

Cessna Model A

01.04.2024 04:25

Vought O3U / SU


steve, e-mail, 18.05.2011 23:53

The YB-60 was such a graceful aircraft that it was almost a shame that the B-52 was a success. Its problem was the same as that of the Bristol Beaufighter: A thick wing inherited from the parent design was so draggy at higher speeds that it negated much of the advantage of greater engine power.


Daniel L. Berek, e-mail, 22.03.2009 23:39

Convair proposed a double-deck transport version of this aircraft as well, in much the same manner the company did with its B-36 (the XC-99 and Model 37). Unlike its piston-engine counterpart, however, this idea never left the drawing board.
http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2931511060048918155qsFJEH
Now that would have been quite a sight to behold!


George Crawford, e-mail, 26.02.2009 18:23

I think that your A/C dimensions are off just a little. I believe that the metric numbers should be feet, and I can't believe that this A\\C is capable of flying at 147,000 feet.


stephen russell, e-mail, 15.06.2008 04:25

Imagine the AF these bombers: B47, B60 & B52, Very radical for SAC.
& having B60 back up B52 into the 1st Gulf War.
Wow.
Thats the Big Stick.




All the World's Rotorcraft


Virtual Aircraft Museum