The Boeing 2707 stemmed from President Kennedy's June 1963 call for a
supersonic transport (SST) to compete with the Anglo-French
Concorde. Unlike Concorde and the Soviet Tu-144, the US SST was to be
made largely of titanium, making it capable of Mach 3. In 1966 Boeing's
variable-geometry (swing-wing) Model 2707 was chosen over proposals from
Lockheed and North American. Boeing built an impressive full-scale mockup
and estimated future sales of 700 - 1000 SSTs. The technical challenges of
a Mach 3 SST were greater than faced by its slower, smaller rivals.
The variable-geometry idea was abandoned in 1968 and a smaller fixed-wing version was
planned, with test flights planned for 1970 and commercial service in 1974.
Two prototypes were begun, but in 1971 the SST programme was cancelled.
Increasing oil prices and environmental concerns were the excuses.
FACTS AND FIGURES
© The cabin of the full-scale mock-up had
room for 277 seats - 30 first class and
247 tourist in a seven-abreast layout.
© The Anglo-French and Soviet
SSTs were only Mach 2 capable
because speeds above Mach 2.7
required much greater use of
heavy and expensive steel alloys
and titanium to withstand
© The 2707 was to have an 18-wheel undercarriage,
with the main wheels grouped in four bogies with
four wheels each, arranged to spread the great
weight and not overstress the runway.
© The swing-wing version could
sweep its wings between 20
and 72 degrees. Minimum
sweep gave better take-off and
| ENGINE||4 x 28690kg General Electric GE4/J5P afterburning turbojets|
| Take-off weight||306175 kg||675004 lb|
| Wingspan||54.97 m||180 ft 4 in|
| Length||93.27 m||306 ft 0 in|
| Height||14.10 m||46 ft 3 in|
| Cruise speed||2900 km/h||1802 mph|
|Ivan Bigovsky, 04.06.2020 17:59|
Cheep yankie copi ov TU144
|Joe Snow, e-mail, 04.06.2017 22:57|
The problem with SST's is they are limited in the routes they can fly. Trans-oceanic flights only, until the sonic boom problem is solved. You will not see an SST flying from New York to Los Angeles any time soon.
|srs, e-mail, 16.01.2017 21:14|
so the latest is that DB Cooper had these heavy metals on his tie that link him to thsi craft. CALL THE FBI if you worked for Boeing's SST project!!
|Don, e-mail, 29.02.2016 14:32|
You can own this restored 60" historical display model.
Search Boeing SST on Ebay. : )
|Forrest, 15.02.2015 06:41|
I was a member of the SST test team at the Boeing High Speed Wind Tunnel near Philadelphia, Pa."
While Orville was in Philly, I was working at Boeing's Supersonic Wind Tunnel at Boeing Field, Seattle.
We were testing vendor control systems for the engine inlet. The final configuration of the inlet (ramp vs spike) was never determined though models and mockups may show either. Went on to retire from Boeing on the F-22 program.
|Tony Martino, e-mail, 12.07.2014 19:33|
I designed the rolling engine stand for the P & W SST engines. Are there any pictures available out there.
|Tim, e-mail, 22.09.2013 21:40|
Continued from earlier post if the plane in the Hiller Museum is the plane from The SST museum in Fl. what happened to the rest of the mock-up i.e. wing tail and the rest of the fuselage
|Tim, e-mail, 22.09.2013 21:37|
I'm wondering if the mock-up on display is the same one from the SST Museum in Kissimmee Fl. I would Love to know as I grew up playing in that mock-up as a child
|Paul Simon, e-mail, 09.03.2013 16:27|
We need a plane that can fly from New York to Los Angeles in 3 1 /2 hours no more than that. With all out technology today we should be able to do that very easily. The faster we go across country which means they'll be more airspace. I flew on the Concorde two times and I loved it. When I got to my meeting I was wide awake wasn't sleepy and wasn't jet Lag. We also need a high-speed train
|Larry Thorold, e-mail, 03.08.2012 23:06|
When I served in the Air Force I had many occasion to have TDY's in the DC area of Boeing...one day while wandering about I had found a small wooden door that lead to the SST containment and boy what an afternoon I had wandering about the many 'stacks' of serialized titanium bars and equipment including a handful of the GE engines, holy cow, you could stand up inside the cowls and reach skyward and not touch the top of the cowl...they were huge!!! I ventured into the full scale(left side)model in the room and was amazed at the size of the interior(seating was 2x2 if I remember correctly and wasp shaped) and the crew compartment was very comfortable and well laid out...I pulled the 'reposition nose' handle and to my surprise the entire foreward assembly dropped to the takeoff /landing position, scared the hell out of me...the trans sonic wing design amazed me...that was a very memorable day for me and I'll never forget thinking that Boeing was on the right track 'in the day' of SST developement only to be politically squashed, I found this to be true many times over the next few decades within my Boeing Military Flight Test career at Edwards AFB following my military retirement...LT
|Tc, e-mail, 02.07.2012 05:35|
I have two Lockheed items I am trying to find out if there would be an interest in. More importantly Are they still considered a classified item.
Supersonic Transport SST volume A-IV Structural Report
A large notebook marked Supersonic Transport Development Phase II-A Volume VI-A airframe design
Both have hundreds of pages filled with diagrams, test results etc. Any info on these would be appreciated. Thank you.
|William S. Vaughn, e-mail, 21.05.2012 04:39|
In the early 70s I was visiting the F.A.A. facility in OK City when I stumbled across the 2707 mockup (ha ha - it was humongous and real hard to miss). It was open so I just wandered up through the cabin and proceeded to get a little "stick" time in the cockpit. I assume that this was the mockup that later ended up in a church in FL for a period of time.
|Eugene Schulte, e-mail, 26.11.2011 01:27|
Charles: I read your account of SST.
I was a materials and process engineer and worked on the SST at Seattle.
I produced Boeing's first composites process specifications for boron and then carbon.
We intended to use boron unidirectional filaments applied to the spar caps to the floor beams.
I also got involved in the bonding preparation of titanium and drilling the stuff.
We all had a shot for developing a insulation material ;to prevent the fuel from boiling at cruse speed.
I remember the whole conversation. Probably a good thing that the project was abandoned but plenty learned from the effort.
I would like a local artist to do a pencil sketch of the 2707 for me. I still have my lapel pin.
If you can send photos that we can use for the sketch, it would be greatly appreciated.
Also I would be interested in the models
Thank you for help in this matter.
Parks College of St. Louis University
940 393 1626
|Howard Syder, e-mail, 09.09.2011 23:37|
I was a design engineer on the the SST working on the droop nose structure. It was a very interesting project and when it was cancelled I thought it was the right decision but for all the wrong reasons.
|Mike, e-mail, 27.08.2011 05:46|
Great write up.
May I use the image for my college essay?
|Mike Schofield, e-mail, 17.06.2011 18:17|
I forgot to make it more interesting, 65,000 ibf in afterburner, x 4.
|Mike Schofield, e-mail, 17.06.2011 18:04|
I may never see the SST mock-up, as my military days are over flying around. However you guys may be interested in the fact that the Paul Garber facility in Suitland Maryland, had one of the GE4 /J5's for the SST, all 8 stages of it. It was complete and on an engine stand ready for insertion to an aircraft that never was. You may wish to check on its location, the Smithsonian at Dulles / Richard Hazy or whatever its name is has been opened for several years, and a lot is being transfered there. The Suitland facility is were all the aircraft are restored prior to display in the Smithsonian, and you need an appoinment to enter. Tours are usually on Wed's. There is a treasure trove of aircraft their.
|Mick Skinner, e-mail, 26.01.2011 11:41|
As a licensed engineer on many Boeing A /C I am sure it would have been as succesful had it been built but it wasn't and to compare it to Concorde ( I am also licensed on it ) is not a fair comparison, Concorde was limited to 2.2 Mach as it was constructed mostly of conventional aluminum, the only Titanium being used on the propulsion nozzle area as Titanium is far more difficult to work and is more prone to cracking, this is not a good feature for an A /C in daily use and has a significant impact on cost in production and operation. Concorde on the other hand was built and operated very succesfully for many years and contributed an operating profit for British Airways even though it was hampered by limitations on supersonic flight over many countries. Boeing 2707SST on the other hand ( and this is only my opinion )was compromised by the additional costs of being too big,too fast and too soon. Had it been built in conventional aluminium I am sure it would have been equal in its success as all other Boeing pax A /C
|Richard Staight, e-mail, 31.12.2010 07:39|
I have a photo of the mockup that I took in Florida in 1976 . I don't recall where exactly it was. We saw a sign on the road and stopped to see it. I also have a color shot of the interior.
I do not know how to post them on this site.
Perhaps someone will tell me
|Maurice Gunderson, e-mail, 02.12.2010 11:17|
The mockup in the photo is displayed in the Hiller Aircraft Museum in San Carlos, California. It's a very good museum, and worth the price of admission just to see the Boeing SST.
Do you have any comments?
All the World's Rotorcraft