Polikarpov I-17

1935

Back to the Virtual Aircraft Museum
  FIGHTERVirtual Aircraft Museum / USSR / Russia / Polikarpov  

Polikarpov I-17

The TsKB-15 single-seat fighter prototype was a diminutive low-wing monoplane of slim configuration, powered by an imported 626kW Hispano-Suiza 12Y inline engine. With an inward-retracting undercarriage, it flew in September 1934 and was followed by the TsKB-19 with the M-100 (Soviet version of the Hispano engine). Armament comprised a 20mm cannon and four 7.62mm machine-guns. Production of a small number as the I-17-2 was reported, but it is not known if the type was used by first-line units. A third prototype (the TsKB-33) had reduced armament in an attempt to cut down weight and increase performance. The projected use of this version as a parasite fighter to be launched from a multiengined 'mother ship' was subsequently abandoned.

3-View 
Polikarpov I-17A three-view drawing (1280 x 878)

Specification 
 CREW1
 ENGINE1 x M-100, 550kW
 WEIGHTS
  Take-off weight1915 kg4222 lb
  Empty weight1710 kg3770 lb
 DIMENSIONS
  Wingspan10.1 m33 ft 2 in
  Length7.4 m24 ft 3 in
  Wing area17.7 m2190.52 sq ft
 PERFORMANCE
  Max. speed490 km/h304 mph
  Cruise speed440 km/h273 mph
  Ceiling9700 m31800 ft
  Range w/max.fuel800 km497 miles
 ARMAMENT1 x 20mm machine-guns, 4 x 7.62mm machine-guns, 100kg of bombs

Comments
Anonymous, 24.08.2022 17:58

Polikarpov intended this as the Soviet equivalent of the Hawker Hurricane, Supermarine Spitfire and Messerschmitt Me109. However, the Soviet Government chose not to develop this fighter further and to persist with production of the I-16. As a result, the Red Air Force did not get a fighter with a modern liquid-cooled engine, comparable to foreign counterparts, until 1941. Nevertheless, the I-17 prototype was displayed prominently at the Paris Aeronautical Salon in 1936, where foreign aeronautical experts apparently were more impressed with it than the Soviets were.

reply

sven, 09.09.2016 19:01

The huge fillet on the fuselage wing joint is likely to have caused unpleasant handling and contrary to appearances a lot of drag.

reply

CRoW56, e-mail, 09.09.2014 23:44

This aircraft has sweet lines and looks like it would be fast and handle well. Why was it abandoned?

reply

Do you have any comments?

Name    E-mail


COMPANY
PROFILE


All the World's Rotorcraft


All rhe World's Rotorcraft AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com Avitop.com